As shown by the media, Haiti non profit and charitable organizations were active during the recent natural disaster. The Red Cross in particular has continued to help victims of floods, hunger, earthquakes and terror attacks. With such disaster preparedness, such organizations require adequate donor support to act quickly in the wake of a hurricane or tsunami. For this to happen, they must demonstrate accountability of funds to boost donor confidence. Ensuring that this aid reaches the destined people goes a long way in boosting this confidence.
The incapability of states to sufficiently control offensive demeanor by those acting in the name of aid has exposed the aid sector to destructive public relations. Unlike other corporations, which must conform to fairly strict book-keeping systems, charities are subject only to the vaguest of regulations. Consequently, donors frequently cannot tell if a charitable trust is well-organized at collecting and distributing funds for laudable causes or just superior at cooking its books.
For these causes to succeed, they must have minimum interference from the government. However, due to lack of integrity, government agencies chip in to monitor the use of these funds. Ironically, instead of monitoring the situation, the government wants its fair share of the loot. This has hurt both givers and receivers of foreign aid.
As a result, they have lost donor confidence and led to the disapproval of their funding applications. It is difficult to tell the good from the bad due to the wanton generalization. The need to address this problem cannot be emphasized. The genuine charities should demonstrate their honesty by keeping accurate books and producing them for audit in form of quarterly reports. They should act like any other financial institution for them to receive continuous support throughout the year.
The conviction that the philanthropic society owes them a living and needs to expend their wealth is flawed and negligent. They ought to appreciate that benefactors have saved for all their life to sustain charitable trusts or make constructive donations to the public. Unscrupulous directors have eroded this trust.
The function of the state turns out to be even more significant when the parliament shifts the blame to the charitable organizations. The function of the aid is to care for the people who face natural calamities or safeguard the environment. Fund-raising is therefore not just about acquiring money from individuals who have an excess of it.
The compassionate sector does not provide cash for its own sake. Do not take for granted that they have surplus or immeasurable possessions. They offer aid since they have constantly thought of helping people to solve their problems. The administration must abstain from taxing the funds but develop assessment of donor maintenance.
In fact, in 2004 there was a 16 percent increase in new supporters to the global aid sector. This growth was largely due to the tsunami. Such disasters will keep on drawing millions of dollars if allocated to the required causes. Haiti non profit organizations require a consistent donor base that provides support in the wake of unique disaster.
The incapability of states to sufficiently control offensive demeanor by those acting in the name of aid has exposed the aid sector to destructive public relations. Unlike other corporations, which must conform to fairly strict book-keeping systems, charities are subject only to the vaguest of regulations. Consequently, donors frequently cannot tell if a charitable trust is well-organized at collecting and distributing funds for laudable causes or just superior at cooking its books.
For these causes to succeed, they must have minimum interference from the government. However, due to lack of integrity, government agencies chip in to monitor the use of these funds. Ironically, instead of monitoring the situation, the government wants its fair share of the loot. This has hurt both givers and receivers of foreign aid.
As a result, they have lost donor confidence and led to the disapproval of their funding applications. It is difficult to tell the good from the bad due to the wanton generalization. The need to address this problem cannot be emphasized. The genuine charities should demonstrate their honesty by keeping accurate books and producing them for audit in form of quarterly reports. They should act like any other financial institution for them to receive continuous support throughout the year.
The conviction that the philanthropic society owes them a living and needs to expend their wealth is flawed and negligent. They ought to appreciate that benefactors have saved for all their life to sustain charitable trusts or make constructive donations to the public. Unscrupulous directors have eroded this trust.
The function of the state turns out to be even more significant when the parliament shifts the blame to the charitable organizations. The function of the aid is to care for the people who face natural calamities or safeguard the environment. Fund-raising is therefore not just about acquiring money from individuals who have an excess of it.
The compassionate sector does not provide cash for its own sake. Do not take for granted that they have surplus or immeasurable possessions. They offer aid since they have constantly thought of helping people to solve their problems. The administration must abstain from taxing the funds but develop assessment of donor maintenance.
In fact, in 2004 there was a 16 percent increase in new supporters to the global aid sector. This growth was largely due to the tsunami. Such disasters will keep on drawing millions of dollars if allocated to the required causes. Haiti non profit organizations require a consistent donor base that provides support in the wake of unique disaster.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.sosoperationespoir.org for more helpful information about Dependable And Frank Haiti Non-profit Societies
No comments:
Post a Comment